Pantry vs Sononym
Both are offline, one-time and analysis-driven. Sononym is built around browsing by ear. Pantry is built around describing what you want.
Pick Pantry if
- You search by describing sounds in words
- You need watch folders that stay current automatically
- You want a free tier to start with
Pick Sononym if
- Your workflow is built around acoustic similarity browsing
- You want deep control over similarity, tuning results across several attributes
| Feature | Pantry | Sononym |
|---|---|---|
| Price / licence | Free up to 15k; €29 one-time unlimited | €89 (~$99) one-time |
| Platforms | macOS, Windows, Linux | macOS, Windows, Linux |
| Auto-tagging (instrument, key, BPM) | Yes | Yes ML classification |
| Semantic / text search | Yes plain-language descriptions | No |
| Find-similar | Yes also from any outside audio file | Yes flagship feature |
| Works fully offline | Yes | Yes |
| Account required | No | No |
| Bundled store | No | No |
| Watch folders | Yes auto-pickup | Manual refresh |
| Duplicate detection | Yes | Yes |
| Drag into DAW | Yes | Yes incl. waveform selections |
| Boolean search operators | Yes | No |
| Free version / trial | Free up to 15k samples (no time limit) | 30-day full-feature trial |
Checked October 2026 against each vendor’s own site.
Pantry also: match any audio file, build kits from your library, suggest sounds for a collection, and filter to sounds you’ve never played.
Two approaches to finding sounds
Pantry and Sononym are the two closest tools in this space: both are local-first, both run analysis on your machine, and neither tries to sell you samples. The difference is in how you search.
Sononym's core interaction is similarity browsing. You pick a sample, and the engine shows you everything in your library that sounds acoustically related, scored across attributes like spectrum, timbre, and pitch. It's powerful when you have a reference point: "I want something that sounds like this kick, but different." Version 1.6 also added a tagging system and faster search performance.
Pantry's core interaction is semantic text search. You type what you're imagining, like "warm analog pad" or "lo-fi vinyl crackle", and the engine matches your words against what it heard during analysis. That works best when you don't have a reference sample yet, just an idea. Pantry also supports boolean operators (kick AND NOT 808) and filter chaining for precise narrowing.
Both tools have the other mode to some extent (Pantry has find-similar, Sononym has metadata filtering), but each tool is built around its primary paradigm.
Price and free tier
Pantry is free with all features for libraries up to 15,000 samples, with no time limit. If your library grows past that, a one-time €29 payment unlocks unlimited samples. Sononym costs €89 (about $99) as a one-time purchase, with a 30-day trial to evaluate it first. Both are one-time purchases with no subscriptions or recurring fees, but Pantry's free tier means you can commit to it with zero cost if your library is modest.
| Library size | Pantry | Sononym |
|---|---|---|
| Up to 15,000 samples | €0 | €89 |
| More than 15,000 | €29 once | €89 |
Keeping the library current
When you download a new sample pack or reorganise folders, Pantry's watch folders detect the changes and analyse new files in the background. The library stays searchable without manual intervention. With Sononym, you'd rescan the relevant folders to pick up changes. For producers who accumulate samples steadily, the difference between automatic and manual upkeep adds up.
When Sononym is the better choice
Sononym has years of development maturity and polish behind its similarity engine. If your workflow is built around acoustic exploration (browsing a visual map of sounds, tuning similarity results across five attributes, and discovering unexpected connections between samples), Sononym's depth in that paradigm is hard to match. It also offers waveform selection and drag-export (select a slice of audio and drag it directly into your DAW), pitch transposition with MIDI device support, file operations like batch renaming and folder merging, and detailed embedded metadata display. If those features matter to your daily workflow, Sononym earns its price.
Frequently asked questions
Is there a free version of Pantry or Sononym?
Pantry is free with full features for up to 15,000 samples. Beyond that, a one-time €29 unlock covers unlimited samples. Sononym has no free tier but offers a fully functional 30-day trial. After the trial, a licence costs €89 (about $99).
Do Pantry and Sononym work offline?
Yes, both work entirely offline. All audio analysis runs locally on your machine. Neither tool uploads your samples to a server or requires an internet connection to function.
Can I use Pantry and Sononym at the same time?
Yes. Both tools read from the sample files on your disk without modifying them. You can point both at the same folders. Use Sononym when you want to explore by acoustic similarity, and Pantry when you want to search by description or filter with boolean operators.
What is the difference between semantic search and similarity search?
Semantic search lets you type a description like "bright plucked synth" and the engine finds samples that match the meaning of those words. Similarity search starts from a specific sample you already have and finds others that sound acoustically alike. Pantry centres on semantic text search; Sononym centres on similarity search. Both tools also offer the other mode to some degree.
Try it on your own library.
Free with every feature up to 15,000 samples. €29 once for unlimited.
Get notified at launch